A26880:626
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Socrates and S•zomen, tells us of great diversity and opposition in the Communions of many Countries, about Easter, and other things, that yet unchristened them not.
When the Scots and Britons would not communicate with Gregory's Austin, nor eat in the same House with the Romans, which party was cut off from Christ?
When the Scots and Britains would not communicate with Gregories Austin, nor eat in the same House with the Romans, which party was cut off from Christ?
Was it Chrysostoms Joannites, or the Council that deposed him, and the Cyrillians, that were cut off from Christ?
Was it Chrysostomes Ioannites, or the Council that deposed him, and the Cyrillians, that were cut off from Christ?
Was it the Party of Meletius, Paulinus, or Flavian at Antioch, that were not united to Christ?