A26880:635
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
When the Italians set up a Patriarch at Aquileia, an hundred years against Rome, which side was unchurched?
When the Pope (Alexander 3. Innocent 4. &c.) interdicted whole Kingdoms (France, England, &c.) and part of the Churches obeyed the Pope, and part the King; and when in the Wars with Frederick, Henr. 4th and 5th, O•h•. &c. part of the Bishops were for the Emperor, and condemned the rest, and the other part condemned them as Henrician Heretics, which side was unchurched?
When the Pope (Alexander 3. Innocent 4. &c.) interdicted whole Kingdoms (France, England, &c.) and part of the Churches obeyed the Pope, and part the King; and when in the Wars with Frederick, Henr. 4th and 5th, O•h•. &c. part of the Bishops were for the Emperor, and condemned the rest, and the other part condemned them as Henrician Hereticks, which side was unchurched?
When all the Truths that Philastrius calls Heresies (in palpable ignorance) had parties condemned for holding them (as Heretics), was it the feigned Heretics, or the condemners, that were unchurched?
When all the Truths that Philastrius calls Heresies (in palpable ignorance) had parties condemned for holding them (as Hereticks), was it the feigned Hereticks, or the condemners, that were unchurched?