A26880:739
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Ans. 1. Yes, Christ. 2. Was it not directly to my purpose, to prove it a Polity, which was that which I alleged it for?
Ans. 1. Yes, Christ. 2. Was it not directly to my purpose, to prove it a Polity, which was that which I alledged it for?
But (saith he) do any of them prove, That Civil and Ecclesiastic Polity is the same thing?
But (saith he) do any of them prove, That Civil and Ecclesiastick Polity is the same thing?
Ans. Yes, in genere. Do they use the word equivocally? Is not Polity or Government in Civils and Ecclesiastics [Polity in genere]? How can these else be distinct species of it? Was this ever denied by Conformist before?
Ans. Yes, in genere. Do they use the word equivocally? Is not Polity or Government in Civils and Ecclesiasticks [Polity in genere]? How can these else be distinct species of it? Was this ever denied by Conformist before?