A26880:740
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But (saith he) do any of them prove, That Civil and Ecclesiastic Polity is the same thing?
But (saith he) do any of them prove, That Civil and Ecclesiastick Polity is the same thing?
Ans. Yes, in genere. Do they use the word equivocally? Is not Polity or Government in Civils and Ecclesiastics [Polity in genere]? How can these else be distinct species of it? Was this ever denied by Conformist before?
Ans. Yes, in genere. Do they use the word equivocally? Is not Polity or Government in Civils and Ecclesiasticks [Polity in genere]? How can these else be distinct species of it? Was this ever denied by Conformist before?
Saith he, ['Do not the Civil and Ecclesiastic Commonwealth differ as much as the Church and the State?
Saith he, ['Do not the Civil and Ecclesiastick Commonwealth differ as much as the Church and the State?