A26882:104
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty liturgy.Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty lyturgy.
London: printed for Thomas Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Num. 11. 1. When the people complained, it displeased the Lord—his anger was kindled—
2 Sam. 11. 27. The thing that David had done displeased the Lord, (Murder, and Adultery.) No, say you, God is not displeased with any sin, there is no displeasure in Heaven.
1 Chr. 21. God was displeased with this thing, therefore he smote Israel.
Psal. 60. 1. O God—thou hast been displeased.