A26882:126
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty liturgy.Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty lyturgy.
London: printed for Thomas Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Dear Brother, I am so far from perceiving any Conviction in your Accusation in this matter, that I must say that you have in this made your self to me what Dr. O. did in the case of Concord. You constrain me to bear my public Testimony against you, when you pretend herein to speak the mind of so great a number of your Acquaintance, when I remember the Sermons that are commonly talked of, and the Collections ⟨p. 22⟩made by the Friendly Debater, and many such others, I look to hear ere long from Press and Pulpits, [That the Nonconformists teach that no Rebellion, Treason, Perjury, or Wickedness is at all displeasing to God▪ to Christ, to Angels, or to any Saint in Heaven▪ Though they call Adulterers, Murderers, and such others to Repentance, and Mourning for Sin, and separate from others as too bad for their Communion, indeed at the same time they tell all the wicked, neither God, nor any in Heaven is displeased with them.]
Dear Brother, I am so far from perceiving any Conviction in your Accusation in this matter, that I must say that you have in this made your self to me what Dr. O. did in the case of Concord. You constrain me to bear my publick Testimony against you, when you pretend herein to speak the mind of so great a number of your Acquaintance, when I remember the Sermons that are commonly talkt of, and the Collections ⟨p. 22⟩made by the Friendly Debater, and many such others, I look to hear e're long from Prefs and Pulpits, [That the Nonconformists teach that no Rebellion, Treason, Perjury, or Wickedness is at all displeasing to God▪ to Christ, to Angels, or to any Saint in Heaven▪ Though they call Adulterers, Murderers, and such others to Repentance, and Mourning for Sin, and separate from others as too bad for their Communion, indeed at the same time they tell all the wicked, neither God, nor any in Heaven is displeased with them.]