A26882:13
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty liturgy.Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty lyturgy.
London: printed for Thomas Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
SIR, Your Book called, A Vindication of Dr. Owen, I find containeth four distinct Parts or Subjects.
I. A Vindication of Dr. Owens Personal Worth: which you and I agreeing in, I have nothing in that to say against you. II. Your Consent to the main of the Cause which I defend, and your dissent from the Persons whose words I Confute: Of this I shall thankfully take notice. III. Your blaming of me for my naming the Dr. and for my manner of defence against his Arguments. IV. Your dissent from me in certain Doctrinals.
Having dismissed the first, as to the second, I thank you,
Having dismist the first, as to the second, I thank you,
1. That you profess your self a hearty friend to all good men, and to the unity of the Spirit in the bond of Peace.