A26882:140
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty liturgy.Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty lyturgy.
London: printed for Thomas Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This is proper true Repentance: Either you deny the Things, or but the Name. If the Thing, which of these deny you.
1. If Saints in Heaven know not sin better then they did here, Heaven is to them as dark as Earth.
2. If they know not that they themselves were the Subjects, and Actors of these sins, they are ignorant, or erroneous.
3. If they know not that Gods way is better than sin, they are brutish.
4. If they love Good, and hate Evil no better then here, then they are no better.