A26882:181
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty liturgy.Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty lyturgy.
London: printed for Thomas Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. Is it disingenuity in me to tell you of twenty untruths in your private Letter (and many notorious,) and ingenuity in you to be offended for being told of them, rather than for writing them? This is to comply with the World, that taketh the detecter only for the sinner.
4. Is a defensive confutation of Error, dealing severely?
4. Is a defensive confutation of Errour, dealing severely?
5. Agreeing Copies confute you. To confute Error is not worse then to own or defend it.
5. Agreeing Copies confute you. To confute Errour is not worse then to own or defend it.
Pag. 6. If it be so heinous to confute it, why did you divulge it?