A26883:1072
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
The First Part: OF THE NATURE, KNOWLEDGE, WILL AND DECREES of GOD,… › Section 24: On the other side.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
692. He proveth as the Calvinists do, [that it was not so much as for original sin foreseen, that God is said to hate Esau; because then he would have hated Jacob also: but it must be referred to the •eer will of God, that one was loved to salvation, and the other so hated as not to be saved.] Just as the Synod of Dort saith.
693. Francisc. à Sancta Clara, alias Davenport, a Learned Scotist in his Deus, Nat. Grat. Probl. 1. pag. 3. describing Predestination out of Augustine, Arriba, Scotus, Suarez, &c. saith [And with all these agreeth the description of Predestination Art. 17. of the English Confession.]
694. And Probl. 2. of the Causes of Predestination he noteth that [We mean not the Causes of Gods will, ex parte actus volendi, sed ex parte volit•rum, in quantum Deus vult unum esse propter aliud.] And on that supposition how easy is it to agree?
694. And Probl. 2. of the Causes of Predestination he noteth that [We mean not the Causes of Gods will, ex parte actus volendi, sed ex parte volit•rum, in quantum Deus vult unum esse propter aliud.] And on that supposition how easie is it to agree?