A26883:1657
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Much less would Jansenius *the zealous Follower of Augustine (so perfectly acquainted with his Works) have so thought and said, and so propugned it. See him at large in his Augustin. de Grat. Christi, lib. 9. cap. 7. pag. 392, 393, &c. & lib. 3. c. 20. pag. 163, 164.
- *Yea and Bradwardine who speaketh more harshly than Alvarez, and yet asserteth falling away from true Grace, though not Predestination, or Gods Will to save. And Jansenius•, To. 1. li. 5. c. 22, 23. p. 126, 127, 128. proveth that the difference between Augustine and Pelagius lay not about free Pardon, or infused habits of Grace, which Pelagius confessed (though many charge him with the contrary, who understand him not.) But that Pelagius confessed not the necessity of that actual Adjutorium Gratiae specialis to keep us from future sin, and to do our duty, besides pardon of former Sin and infused habitual Grace. By which it appeareth that Aug•sti•• and he agreed, that Remission of Sin and infused habits may be lost; and that Augustine said perseverance upon Gods Will or Election, and his actual help or adjutorium conservans.Yea and Bradwardine who speaketh more harshly than Alvarez, and yet asserteth falling away from true Grace, though not Predestination•, or Gods Will to save. And Jansenius•, To. 1. li. 5. c. 22, 23. p. 126, 127, 128. proveth that the difference between Augustine and Pelagius lay not about free Pardon, or infused habits of Grace, which Pelagius confessed (though many charge him with the contrary, who understand him not.) But that Pelagius confessed not the necessity of that actual Adjutorium Gratiae specialis to keep us from future sin, and to do our duty, besides pardon of former Sin and infused habitual Grace. By which it appeareth that Aug•sti•• and he agreed, that Remission of Sin and infused habits may be lost; and that Augustine said perseverance upon Gods Will or Election, and his actual help or adjutorium conservans.