A26883:2109
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 15. It is but to make toil for the Reader to answer all these fallacies and quibbles, founded in some false supposition or ambiguous word: else I would answer the rest of that Digression, and his Digres. 5. li. 1. p. 2. contra Alvar. Only here I must take notice, that in this Digr. 9. he himself rejecteth Greg. Arim. and Hurtado's assertion of Gods Determining us to this or that Numerical Act, as distinct from another ejusdem speciei, ut merum figmentum, & ad curiositati hominum nimium infoelici satisfaciendum duntaxat introductum. Whereas were it not for wearying the Reader, I might show, that the same Reasons will hold for or against this numerical, as are for or against his specific predetermination. And the species having no existence but in the individuals, and himself saying, that ⟨p. 38⟩[…] ⟨p. 39⟩[…] ⟨p. 40⟩[…] ⟨p. 41⟩[…] ⟨p. 42⟩Gods motion is ad actus singulares, if he say that it is not to that singular act that is done, rather than that which is not done, he giveth up his whole cause.
§. 15. It is but to make toil for the Reader to answer all these fallacies and quibbles, founded in some false supposition or ambiguous word: else I would answer the rest of that Digression, and his Digres. 5. li. 1. p. 2. contra Alvar. Only here I must take notice, that in this Digr. 9. he himself rejecteth Greg. Arim. and Hurtado's assertion of Gods Determining us to this or that Numerical Act, as distinct from another ejusdem speciei, ut merum figmentum, & ad curiositati hominum nimium infoelici satisfaciendum duntaxat introductum. Whereas were it not for wearying the Reader, I might shew, that the same Reasons will hold for or against this numerical, as are for or against his specifical predetermination. And the species having no existence but in the individuals, and himself saying, that ⟨p. 38⟩〈…〉