A26883:2702
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
A. But both these Parties have a great deal of very plausible reason for their Opinions, as you may see in the Dom•n•oans on one side, and Hobbes against Bra•hall, and in Dr. Jeremy Taylor, his Tre••. of Repentance, on the other; and therefore are not to be so slighted.
B. I do not slight them, but confute them. I confess that the cases are not without difficulty, yea not a little. But I am surer that Religion is not to be renounced, than they can be of the truth of their Opinions. And do you think that if one of them had written for the Cause of •• ▪ li•n, Porphyry or Celsus against Christ, that they would not have spoken as plausibly, and made the case seem as difficult, at least to be argumentatively answered as they here do.
B. I do not slight them, but confute them. I confess that the cases are not without difficulty, yea not a little. But I am surer that Religion is not to be renounced, than they can be of the truth of their Opinions. And do you think that if one of them had written for the Cause of •• ▪ li•n, Porphyrie or Celsus against Christ, that they would not have spoken as plausibly, and made the case seem as difficult, at least to be argumentatively answered as they here do.
A. Now let us here your way or terms before mentioned, what they are?