A26883:2915
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
B. As men, we must not judge falsely of God, when we know that it is false. If veil finem & media be certainly one without any diversity in God, saying what is in the connoted Objects, and the relation or denomination; how can we without sin distinguish where there is no difference? But I pray you tell me, what mean you by Gods intendere •••em?
B. As men, we must not judge falsly of God, when we know that it is false. If velle finem & media be certainly one without any diversity in God, saying what is in the connoted Objects, and the relation or denomination; how can we without sin destinguish where there is no difference? But I pray you tell me, what mean you by Gods intendere •••em?
C. I mean that as every wise man doth first will an end, and then do all for it, so doth God.
B. We call nothing to man an end, but something which he wanteth, •• at least is without: But God wanteth nothing, nor is ever without his ••d, or the accomplishment of his Will. But of this I crave leave to refer you to the first Book, where I have fully showed that God willeth an •••• improperly, and not as man doth. But tell me, what take you to be strictly Gods end?
B. We call nothing to man an end, but something which he wanteth, •• at least is without: But God wanteth nothing, nor is ever without his ••d, or the accomplishment of his Will. But of this I crave leave to refer you to the first Book, where I have fully shewed that God willeth an improperly, and not as man doth. But tell me, what take you to be strictly Gods end?