87. By all this it is evinced that God Causeth not the futurity of sin; And that there needeth no Decree of God to make Sin pass è numero possibilium in numerum futurorum; And consequently that the Learned and pious Dr. Twice his Achillean argument, which is the strength of his Book de Scientia Media is but delusory: As the excellent Strangius also hath fully manifested. And his admired Bradwardine is as weak in his attempts on the same subject, and proveth God the Cause of all futurition by no better reasons than he proveth, that without him there would be no impossibles; yea that non posset esse impossibile: When it were impossible any thing should be, were there no God; and yet that impossibility is nothing and needeth no cause. It's strange how some Learned men confound Things and Nothings, and the Notions and Names of Nothings with the Nothings named. So Bradwardine l. 1. c. 18. p. 221. will tell us how God knoweth complex objects, and distinguisheth those that are antecedent to Gods Intellection from those that are consequent: The former sort are such as these [God is God, is eternal, omnipotent, &c.] These he saith are the Causes that God knoweth them, being before his knowledge of them: The other about Creatures are after it and caused by it. Yet doth the good man thus humbly Preface [Non proprie & distincte sed similitudinarie balbutiendo vix tenus possum vel scio, ignarus homuncio, excelsa scientiae Dei mirabilis resonare.] But see how the world is troubled with this profane *presumption, and how justly Paul cautioned us against seduction by vain Philosophy: and what danger the Church is in of losing Faith, Religion and Charity, and peace in a game at words. What is this Complexe object [Deus est]? Is it any thing or nothing? If nothing, it is not before Gods knowledge and the Cause of it. If any thing, Is it God or a Creature? A Creature is not before God, nor a cause of his knowledge, which is God himself. If it be God is it his Essence as such, or his Essential properties, or the Persons? None of these: For Gods essence is the prime Incomplexe Being, and not a Complex proposition, [Dens est]: His Properties, primary, are Omnipotent-vital-power, Intellect and Will; But these also are the same Incomplexe essence, and not propositions:
87. By all this it is evinced that God Causeth not the futurity of sin; And that there needeth no Decree of God to make Sin pass è numero possibilium in numerum futurorum; And consequently that the Learned and pious Dr. Twisse his Achillean argument, which is the strength of his Book de Scientia Media is but delusory: As the excellent Strangius also hath fully manifested. And his admired Bradwardine is as weak in his attempts on the same subject, and proveth God the Cause of all futurition by no better reasons than he proveth, that without him there would be no impossibles; yea that non posset esse impossibile: When it were impossible any thing should be, were there no God; and yet that impossibility is nothing and needeth no cause. It's strange how some Learned men confound Things and Nothings, and the Notions and Names of Nothings with the Nothings named. So Bradwardine l. 1. c. 18. p. 221. will tell us how God knoweth complex objects, and distinguisheth those that are antecedent to Gods Intellection from those that are consequent: The former sort are such as these [God is God, is eternal, omnipotent, &c.] These he saith are the Causes that God knoweth them, being before his knowledge of them: The other about Creatures are after it and caused by it. Yet doth the good man thus humbly Preface [Non proprie & distincte sed similitudinarie balbutiendo vix tenus possum vel scio, ignarus homuncio, excelsa scientiae Dei mirabilis resonare.] But see how the world is troubled with this prophane *presumption, and how justly Paul cautioned us against seduction by vain Philosophy: and what danger the Church is in of losing Faith, Religion and Charity, and peace in a game at words. What is this Complexe object [Deus est]? Is it any thing or nothing? If nothing, it is not before Gods knowledge and the Cause of it. If any thing, Is it God or a Creature? A Creature is not before God, nor a cause of his knowledge, which is God himself. If it be God is it his Essence as such, or his Essential properties, or the Persons? None of these: For Gods essence is the prime Incomplexe Being, and not a Complexe proposition, [Dens est]: His Properties, primary, are Omnipotent-vital-power, Intellect and Will; But these also are the same Incomplexe essence, and not propositions:
- *Hervtus in his Quodlib. puts the question, Whether it be not a Mortal sin in a Divine to omit things necessary, and to treat of curiosities? But he was too guilty himself to answer it as plainly as he ought.