A26883:365
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
123. Here Scotus supposeth things to lye in this order in the Divine 1Intellect, [1. The Divine Essence moveth the Divine intellect to know it ⟨p. 20⟩self, and all that is formally in it. 2. To the simple Intellection of all that is Intelligible, as abstracting from existence, or any order to it. 3. To the knowledge of all necessary copulations, which are known by connection of terms, and this naturally and necessarily before the wills determination: because they are not True because God willeth it, but antecedently formally of themselves. But not so to the Knowledge of contingent copulations, &c.] How easy were it to open much uncertainty and figment in these bold assertions?2
123. Here Scotus supposeth things to lye in this order in the Divine 1Intellect, [1. The Divine Essence moveth the Divine intellect to know it ⟨p. 20⟩self, and all that is formally in it. 2. To the simple Intellection of all that is Intelligible, as abstracting from existence, or any order to it. 3. To the knowledge of all necessary copulations, which are known by connexion of terms, and this naturally and necessarily before the wills determination: because they are not True because God willeth it, but antecedently formally of themselves. But not so to the Knowledge of contingent copulations, &c.] How easie were it to open much uncertainty and figment in these bold assertions?2
- 1Scot. Quodlib. q. 14. Litre. S. & T.Scot. Quodlib. q. 14. Liter. S. & T.
- 2Vid. Rad. ib. p. 497, 496. Vid. Ruiz de Vol. Dei disp. 16. sect. 5. p. 173. Citing abundance of Schoolmen as holding etiam nunc posse Deum efficere ut non voluerit aut praedestinaverit nec praescierit; and some saying yet more, nunc esse possibile per potentiam absolutam, ut non fuerit facta revelatio de futuris Dei operibus. Is not this profane boldness with the most holy God?