A26883:3792
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
C. The first is an universal operation, the other a particular.
B. Do you mean that the difference of the acts or operations is at all ex parte agentis, sen act us ut est agentis, antecedent to the effect, or only in the effect it self.
C. I dare not say that there is any difference in God, for it is against his simplicity; and his very will and act as in himself is his Essence, though variously related and denominated by connotation: Therefore I must needs confess that the diversity is only in the effect.
C. I dare not say that there is any difference in God, for it is against his simplicity; and his very will and act as in himself is his Essence, though vario•sly related and denominated by cannotation: Therefore I must needs confess that the diversity is only in the effect.
B. Do you not see then what a delusory and troublesome stir men make for and about mere words? What's the Crimination come to then about Acquired and Infused Habits? when the difference is only in the effects? You confess that all proper Habits Infused are by our cogitation and use of means, and so are also acquired. And you confess that all Acquired Habits are wrought besides our cogitation and use of means by an immediate influx of God; so that as to the Causes you can name no difference: And yet the words Acquired and Infused signify a difference in the Causes, and their operation, and not in the Effect, by their notation. Is not this deceit then?