A26883:3867
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The eighth Crimination.
C. They make mans Free-will, and not Gods differencing Grace to be the cause that one man by Faith doth differ from another that hath 1no Faith. Contrary to Paul's supposition, who made thee to differ? Tilenus could not answer Camero to this charge.
- 1Remonstr. Synod. ubi supra. [Si quaeratur quae sit causa cur hic convertitur, non autem ille? Respondemus, hic conv•rtitur quia Deus bunc non apponentem novam contumaciam convertit: Ille non convertitur quia novam contumaciam opponit: Queries, cur hic opponit novam contumaciam, alter nons Respondemus, Hic opponit quia oppo•ere vult: Ille non opponit quia a gratia movetur ne opponere velit: Quaeres, annon ille qui non opponit novam contumaciam & per consequens convertitur, majorem •abebat gratiam, quam qui opponit, & per consequens non convertitur? Respondemus, Antecedentem & praevenientem gratiam aequalem esse posse: sed coopelantem hab•t prior, & non posterior.Remonstr. Synod. ubi supra. [Si quaeratur quae sit causa cur hic convertitur, non autem ille? Respondemus, hic conv•rtitur quia Deus bunc non apponentem novam contumaciam convertit: Ille non convertitur quia novam contumaciam opponit: Quaeres, cur hic opponit novam contumaciam, alter nons Respondemus, Hic opponit quia oppo•ere vult: Ille non opponit quia a gratia movetur ne opponere velit: Quaeres, annon ille qui non opponit novam contumaciam & per consequens convertitur, majorem •abebat gratiam, quam qui opponit, & per consequens non convertitur? Respondemus, Antecedentem & praevenientem gratiam aequalem esse posse: sed coopelantem habt prior, & non posterior.