A26883:3898
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
C. I cannot answer what you have said for it: And when I read Dallaeus Apolog. and in him almost all ancient Writers, and late Churches for it, I dare not be so singular as Spanhemius and a few more of late in denying this Grace of God. Though I once thought that it had been Objective only, and with Amyrald I noted little more in the Controversy, than between the Objective and Subjective grace, as if there had been no other Efficient grace to come in question. But I am convinced, 1. that de facto there is a degree of Grace ad posse that leaveth men unexcusable, which is not effectual in the event: For I dare not say that I could never have sinned less, or done better than I did. 2. And that the same degree of the Spirits help is not sufficient to an utterly unprepared Soul, as to the prepared; or to cause a man to believe and love God above all, as may cause him to forbear some sin, or to use some means 1for further Grace: Therefore such a thing as is called sufficient and universal Grace or help I do confess. But (by the way) if Christ be the universal Dispenser of this Grace, how reacheth it to those that know not Christ.
C. I cannot answer what you have said for it: And when I read Dallaeus Apolog. and in him almost all ancient Writers, and late Churches for it, I dare not be so singular as Spanhemius and a few more of late in denying this Grace of God. Though I once thought that it had been Objective only, and with Amyrald I noted little more in the Controversie, than between the Objective and Subjective grace, as if there had been no other Efficient grace to come in question. But I am convinced, 1. that de facto there is a degree of Grace ad posse that leaveth men unexcusable, which is not effectual in the event: For I dare not say that I could never have sinned less, or done better than I did. 2. And that the same degree of the Spirits help is not sufficient to an utterly unprepared Soul, as to the prepared; or to cause a man to believe and love God above all, as may cause him to forbear some sin, or to use some means 1for further Grace: Therefore such a thing as is called sufficient and universal Grace or help I do confess. But (by the way) if Christ be the universal Dispenser of this Grace, how reacheth it to those that know not Christ.
- 1