A26883:4470
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
R. Quest. 7. Are not they then of your judgement as to the Matter, who hold Merit in no other sense, than as it is [Rewardable well-doing] or [a Moral aptitude for Reward?]
L. I deny not that with such I differ but in the Name.
R. Quest. 8. Do not you know that it is the common usage of the word, in Civil and Ecclesiastical Writers, to take Meritum and Praemium so far for Relatives, as that omne Praemium est meriti praemium; though omne meritum be not Praemii meritum. Reward and Rewardableness are thus meant as related. It's true that Meritum is sometime taken less properly for any Dueness; •s a man is said to Merit his Fathers Legacy, that is, hath right to it: sometimes it is taken for any Moral Congruity: sometimes in malam partem for Commerit of punishment: and sometimes for a fault it self. As Calvin noteth on the word. But still every Reward is formally related to Merit or Rewardableness.
R. Quest. 8. Do not you know that it is the common usage of the word, in Civil and Ecclesiastical Writers, to take Meritum and Praemium so far for Relatives, as that omne Praemium est meriti praemium; though omne meritum be not Praemii meritum. Reward and Rewardableness are thus meant as related. It's true that Meritum is sometime taken less properly for any Dueness; •s a man is said to Merit his Fathers Legacie, that is, hath right to it: sometimes it is taken for any Moral Congruity: sometimes in malam partem for Commerit of punishment: and sometimes for a fault it self. As Calvin noteth on the word. But still every Reward is formally related to Merit or Rewardableness.