A26883:4506
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
De sacram. tit. 1. Eckius, Marsilius and Bellarmine saith S. Clara deny all merit of congruity. Greg. Arim. 1. d. 17. q. 1. a 2. saith that there is no merit of blessedness by condignity. Durandus 1. d. 27. q. 2. saith there is no merit of condignity with God, nisi largo modo. So Marsilius in 2. d. 27. Brugensis in Psal. 35. Eckius in Cent. de Pradest. Cusanus, Stapleton and others, of whom S. Clara referreth you to Suarez in 3 Tho. disp. 10. sect. 7. q. 3. Bradwardine c. 39. fol. 338. laboureth to prove that the increase of Grace or Glory is not merited de condigno, but de congr•o, and that all Catholics so hold. And next denyeth merit de congruo, and all by reasons which S. Clara taketh to be valid. Soto a Thomist denieth all merit de congruo, and saith the Fathers held it not. 4. d. 14. q. 2. a. 5. & l. 2. de nat. & Grat. c. 4. Bonaventure 2. d. 28. a. 2. saith Pelagius erred. 1. In holding that the first ⟨p. 271⟩grace was merited; 2. That by the strength of Free-will we can dispose or prepare our selves for grace.
De sacram. tit. 1. Eckius, Marsilius and Bellarmine saith S. Clara deny all merit of congruity. Greg. Arim. 1. d. 17. q. 1. a 2. saith that there is no merit of blessedness by condignity. Durandus 1. d. 27. q. 2. saith there is no merit of condignity with God, nisi largo modo. So Marsilius in 2. d. 27. Brugensis in Psal. 35. Eckius in Cent. de Pradest. Cusanus, Stapleton and others, of whom S. Clara referreth you to Suarez in 3 Tho. disp. 10. sect. 7. q. 3. Bradwardine c. 39. fol. 338. laboureth to prove that the increase of Grace or Glory is not merited de condigno, but de congr•o, and that all Catholicks so hold. And next denyeth merit de congruo, and all by reasons which S. Clara taketh to be valid. Soto a Thomist denyeth all merit de congruo, and saith the Fathers held it not. 4. d. 14. q. 2. a. 5. & l. 2. de nat. & Grat. c. 4. Bonaventure 2. d. 28. a. 2. saith Pelagius erred. 1. In holding that the first ⟨p. 271⟩grace was merited; 2. That by the strength of Free-will we can dispose or prepare our selves for grace.