A26883:784
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
506. Yet let it be still remembered that all this Controversy is not properly de re, but de modo loquendi; or of the extrinsic denomination of Gods Will, and not of his Will as in it self, which is his Essence, and but One. But yet here denominations must be carefully used.
506. Yet let it be still remembred that all this Controversie is not properly de re, but de modo loquendi; or of the extrinsick denomination of Gods Will, and not of his Will as in it self, which is his Essence, and but One. But yet here denominations must be carefully used.
507. And by the way, that you may understand what I mean by denominations, from connotation and relation to the terminating object, note what Ockam saith in Quodlib. 5. q. 25. that Conceptus est vel 1. Absolutus e. g. hominis, 2. Connotativus, e. g. albi, 3. Relativus, ut patris: & differunt in hoc: 1. Conceptus absolutus omnia sua significata significat aeque, primo, & uno modo,—in recto—2. Nomen Connotativum proprie significat primo unum, & aliud secundario, & unum in recto & aliud in obliquo—3. Conceptus relativus maxim concretus habet omnes praedictas conditiones quas habet connotativus: sed differunt in hoc quod quandocunque conceptus connotativus vere praedicatur de aliquo, convenienter potest sibi addi suum absolutum, in aliquo solum: quia nihil est album nisi sit album albedine: sed Relativo potest addi casus obliquus qui non est ejus absolutum—ut servi dominus—Omnis Conceptus Relativus est Connotativus: at non è Converso.
507. And by the way, that you may understand what I mean by denominations, from connotation and relation to the terminating object, note what Ockam saith in Quodlib. 5. q. 25. that Conceptus est vel 1. Absolutus e. g. hominis, 2. Connotativus, e. g. albi, 3. Relativus, ut patris: & differunt in hoc: 1. Conceptus absolutus omnia sua significata significat aeque, primo, & uno modo,—in recto—2. Nomen Connotativum proprie significat primo unum, & aliud secundario, & unum in recto & aliud in obliquo—3. Conceptus relativus maxime concretus habet omnes praedictas conditiones quas habet connotativus: sed differunt in hoc quod quandocunque conceptus connotativus vere praedicatur de aliquo, convenienter potest sibi addi suum absolutum, in aliquo solum: quia nihil est album nisi sit album albedine: sed Relativo potest addi casus obliquus qui non est ejus absolutum—ut servi dominus—Omnis Conceptus Relativus est Connotativus: at non è Converso.