Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…

Therefore his assertion of a Notitia approbationis rei tanquam Bonae in •nere Conducibilis, etsi non honesti, is detestable.

616. Ibid. p. 196. He again saith, that Though it be dishonest in the feature to sin, because forbidden, it is not dishonest in God to will that he •• it by his permission, it being unice conducibile to his glory—•nsw. 1. Fie upon this conducibile and unicè too. 2. Fie upon this oft •peated [permittente non efficiente;] It is utterly lusory or immodest: •or a man that maintaineth that no sinner doth any thing in sinning, but •hat God as the first total cause predetermined his will to, even as to all •e entity in act and circumstances imaginable; and that in all omissions, • was a natural Impossibility to have done one omitted act without this •edetermining premotion: And for the man that in the next saith that •alum non est Objectum Volentis aut facientis, but ipsa effectio rei, I •y for this man yet to say, that the creature effecteth sin, and God effecteth • not, is too too gross. The common evasion is, that sin is not any ••ing, and therefore not effectible: But why then do they say, that the feature effecteth it? when they have said and defended, that the crea•re doth nothing but what God doth, and what he unavoidably maketh ••m do.

616. Ibid. p. 196. He again saith, that Though it be dishonest in the eature to sin, because forbidden, it is not dishonest in God to will that he it by his permission, it being unice conducibile to his glory—nsw. 1. Fie upon this conducibile and unicè too. 2. Fie upon this oft peated [permittente non efficiente;] It is utterly lusory or immodest: or a man that maintaineth that no sinner doth any thing in sinning, but hat God as the first total cause predetermined his will to, even as to all e entity in act and circumstances imaginable; and that in all omissions, was a natural Impossibility to have done one omitted act without this edetermining premotion: And for the man that in the next saith that alum non est Objectum Volentis aut facientis, but ipsa effectio rei, I y for this man yet to say, that the creature effecteth sin, and God effecteth not, is too too gross. The common evasion is, that sin is not any ing, and therefore not effectible: But why then do they say, that the eature effecteth it? when they have said and defended, that the creare doth nothing but what God doth, and what he unavoidably maketh m do.