Church-history of the government of bishops and their councils abbreviated including the chief part…

§ 91. Binnius recordeth that Leutherius Archbishop of Sens did now ⟨p. 338⟩begin the Heresy of Berengarius. It seems then, neither Luther, nor Zuinglius, nor Berengarius, nor Bertram (alias Ratram) began it. But where will the reader find that Transubstantiation was yet named, or by any consent received? so that this is but to confess that yet the doctrine contrary to Transubstantiation did still obtain: And the name of heresy from Baron. or Bin. signifies no more against this Archbishop than the name of Magic and Diabolism against Sylvester 2. from many Historians.

§ 91. Binnius recordeth that Leutherius Archbishop of Sens did now ⟨p. 338⟩begin the Heresie of Berengarius. It seems then, neither Luther, nor Zuinglius, nor Berengarius, nor Bertram (alias Ratram) began it. But where will the reader find that Transubstantiation was yet named, or by any consent received? so that this is but to confess that yet the doctrine contrary to Transubstantiation did still obtain: And the name of heresie from Baron. or Bin. signifies no more against this Archbishop than the name of Magick and Diabolism against Silvester 2. from many Historians.

§ 92. In a Council at Frankford the Emperor Henry, having a great love to Bamberg, would endow it and make it an Archbishopric. The Bishop of Wir••burge would not come to the Council unless it might be joined to his Bishopric. It seemed a hard controversy. The good Emperor (oft prostrate before them) first, having no Children, dedicateth all that he hath to Christ, and then desireth them to consider, that [It was not for the Lord, but for ambition, and to get more dignity that this Bishop did resist his desire] (his agent speaking for him.) (Oh that Princes had sooner discerned the evil of such ambition and aspiring!) At last the Emperor (being present) carried it, and chose an Archbishop who was ordained to Bamberg.