A26898:775
Church-history of the government of bishops and their councils abbreviated including the chief part…
Church-history of the government of bishops and their councils abbreviated including the chief part of the government of Christian princes and popes, and a true account of the most troubling controversies and heresies till the Reformation ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed by B. Griffin for Thomas Simmons, 1680
Church-History OF BISHOPS And their COUNCILS ABRIDGED, &c. › Chapter 7
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 18. In brief, After the reading of many Papers, and Ibas Epistles, the tria Capitula were condemned, viz. Theodore Mopsuest. and the writings of Theodoret against Cyril, and Ibas Epistle. And so the Emperor found the Council as obedient as he desired.
§ 19. But Vigilius Bishop of Rome, who would not come to the Council, now giveth in his Constitutum, or his own judgment upon the whole Case, and that with great moderation. He first reciteth many passages of Theodore Mopsuest. which he renounceth; and he dispraiseth the passages of Theodoret and Ibas, but he refuseth to join in the anathematizing of them, alleging that good men have their errors, and instancing in many whose errors were noted, and yet their persons not condemned, especially when they had either recanted them, or better explained their words: And he noteth that it would be a great injury to the Calcedon Council, to have its own members now thus condemned, that were by them accepted. [Quid enim aliud est mendaces aut simulantes professionem rectae fidei Patres in sancta Calced. Synodo residentes ostendere, quam dicere aliquos ex eis similia sapuisse Nestorio; quorum judicio Nestorium ejusque dogmata fuisse damnata.]
§ 19. But Vigilius Bishop of Rome, who would not come to the Council, now giveth in his Constitutum, or his own judgment upon the whole Case, and that with great moderation. He first reciteth many passages of Theodore Mopsuest. which he renounceth; and he dispraiseth the passages of Theodoret and Ibas, but he refuseth to join in the anathematizing of them, alledging that good men have their errors, and instancing in many whose errors were noted, and yet their persons not condemned, especially when they had either recanted them, or better explained their words: And he noteth that it would be a great injury to the Calcedon Council, to have its own members now thus condemned, that were by them accepted. [Quid enim aliud est mendaces aut simulantes professionem rectae fidei Patres in sancta Calced. Synodo residentes ostendere, quam dicere aliquos ex eis similia sapuisse Nestorio; quorum judicio Nestorium ejusque dogmata fuisse damnata.]