A26912:278
A defence of the principles of love, which are necessary to the unity and…
A defence of the principles of love, which are necessary to the unity and concord of Christians and are delivered in a book called The cure of church-divisions ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Nevil Simmons, 1671
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
EXCEPT. II. ib. There is daily much1 greater profaneness, and the Consequent of profaneness, Immorality, acted by those (4) whom yet Mr. Baxter never mentioneth but with honour; As if no sins or miscarriages were to be blamed but theirs, who are unable to defend themselves.
EXCEPT. II. ib. There is daily much1 greater prophaneness, and the Consequent of prophaneness, Immorality, acted by those (4) whom yet Mr. Baxter never mentioneth but with honour; As if no sins or miscarriages were to be blamed but theirs, who are unable to defend themselves.
- 14 Untruth.
Answ. 1. IF this were true, I were much too blame, it being the very usage of others against my self, which I have great reason to complain of.
2. But if it was possible for you to believe your own words, that I never mention them but with honour, I shall think that there are few things that you may not possibly believe. Reader, if thou peruse the book, and ⟨p. 18⟩yet believe this Author, I am not capable of satisfying thee in this, nor will I undertake1 it in any thing else. Are these terms of honour Pref. p. 18. [How long Lord must thy Church and Cause be in the hands of unexperienced furious fools▪ &c.] Do I honour them when I so much display their sin? And when in the scheme in the conclusion I describe it? And when I tell you of many of such Ministers, and that it is a duty to separate from them, or disown them. And when in the history of Martin, I tell you how near it I am my self, as to such as Martin separated from? And when I cite Gildas, calling such no Ministers, but enemies and traitors, &c. Were you not very rash in this?