The divine appointment of the Lords day proved as a separated day for holy…

3. And note that even these dissenters, did still make no question of keeping the Lords day, which showeth that it was on foot from the times of the Apostles. […] (whoever it was, and whenever he wrote) saith that [After the Sabbath we keep the Lords day.] And Pseudo-Clemens Can. 33. saith [Servants work five days, but on the Sabbath and Lords day, they keep holy day in the Church, for the Doctrine (or Learning) of Godliness]

3. And note that even these dissenters, did still make no question of keeping the Lords day, which sheweth that it was on foot from the times of the Apostles. 〈…〉 (whoever it was, and whenever he wrote) saith that [After the Sabbath we keep the Lords day.] And Pseudo-Clemens Can. 33. saith [Servants work five dayes, but on the Sabbath and Lords day, they keep holy day in the Church, for the Doctrine (or Learning) of Godliness]

The Text of Gal. 4. 10. is of the same sense with Col. 2. 16. against the Jews Sabbath, and therefore needeth no other defence.

And I would have you consider, whether as Christs Resurrection was the foundation of the Lords day; so Christs lying dead and buried in a Grave on the seventh day Sabbath, was not a ⟨p. 85⟩fundamental abrogation of it: I say not the Actual and plenary abrogation: For it was the Command of Christ by his Word, Spirit, or both to the Apostles before proved, which fully made the change: But as the Resurrection was the Ground of the new day so his Burial seemeth to intimate, that the day with all the Jewish Law which it was the symbolical profession of, lay dead and buried with him. Sure I am that he saith, when the Bridegroom is taken from them, then shall they fast and mourn; but he was most notably taken from them, when he lay dead in the Grave; And if they must fast and mourn that day, they could not keep it as a Sabbath, which was a day of joy Therefore as by death he overcame him that had the power of death,