A26924:628
The English nonconformity as under King Charles II and King James II truly stated…
The English nonconformity as under King Charles II and King James II truly stated and argued by Richard Baxter ; who earnestly beseecheth rulers and clergy not to divide and destroy the land and cast their own souls on the dreadful guilt and punishment of national perjury ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1689
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
L. But they prove thus, that it meaneth no such Consent or Approbation. The Liturgy requireth you to read the Apocrypha, and yet not to believe all things in it to be true; For, say they, divers things in Tobit are evidently false: And so tho' it bind you to use and read Athanasius's Creed, it binds you not to believe all in it to be true.
M. This Cheat is too gross to deceive a School-Boy with. Is Athanasius's Creed a real part of the Common-Prayer Book, contained in it, or not?
M. This Cheat is too gross to deceive a School-Boy with. Is Athanasius's Creed a real part of the Common-Prayer Book, contain'd in it, or not?
L. Yes, no doubt; we there find it both contained and prescribed Verbatim.
M. Is the Apocrypha any part of the Common-Prayer Book, and contained in it, or not?