A26931:522
Full and easy satisfaction which is the true and safe religion in a conference…Full and easie satisfaction which is the true and safe religion in a conference…
Full and easy satisfaction which is the true and safe religion in a conference between D. a doubter, P. a papist, and R. a reformed Catholic Christian : in four parts ... / by Richard Baxter.Full and easie satisfaction which is the true and safe religion in a conference between D. a doubter, P. a papist, and R. a reformed Catholick Christian : in four parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for Nev. Simmons, 1674
Part 4 › Chapter 11: The Conclusion of the first Book: The Causes of Popery.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
D. But you know that they distinguish of faith Explicit and Implicit: He may be Implicitly a Christian that believeth not the Essentials Explicitly; as long as he believeth that which would infer them; if they were made known to him to be indeed the Word of God.
D. But you know that they distinguish of faith Explicite and Implicite: He may be Implicitely a Christian that believeth not the Essentials Explicitely; as long as he believeth that which would infer them; if they were made known to him to be indeed the Word of God.
R. Thus do Words abuse and cheat the ignorant: Could you but read their own Dr. Holden before cited in his Analys. fid. you would find this distinction justly rendered by him shameful and ridiculous, according to their common sense and use of it; and the truer sense delivered and vindicated. An Implicit faith or Knowledge we confess to be true, as it is opposed to 1. A distinct, or 2. To a well-expressed faith or Knowledge. For it is Implicit, ☞ 1. As to the Object, when a man knoweth the whole matter, but not ⟨p. 162⟩by distinct parts: As a man may know a Cup of water, and not know how many drops or drams it is; or he may know a sentence, and not know how many letters are in it. 2. Or it is Implicit as to the Act, when it is yet but a crude imperfect conception,1 and the thing is really known, but not the Logical notions, or Grammatical names, either the verba oris or mentis by which it should be expressed: So that the man cannot notify his knowledge to another. These two are called Implicit; the first signifieth Confused and General Knowledge, and the other Imperfect and undigested. But to call that Implicit faith or knowledge, which extendeth only to some Principles, and not to the Conclusions themselves, is 1. To Call No-knowledge and faith, by the name of knowledge and faith. 2. And by their application to confound the World and the Church, and to make all the Infidels and Heathens to be Christians, and every Fool a Philosopher. For, 1. All men of Reason know these two Principles (who own a God), 1. That God is not a liar, but all his Word is True. 2. That all the Truths in the world are God's, some way or other revealed by him. Therefore, if they knew that the Gospel were Gods word, they would believe it: or if they knew it to be one of those Truths that are in the world, they would take it to be of God. And thus all Infidels, and Turks, and Pagans may (by such abuse) be called Implicit Christians. But why then do the Papists burn the Protestants when if their Religion were true, we are all Implicitly