A26945:33
The judgment of Mr. Baxter concerning ceremonies and conformity with a short reflection upon…
The judgment of Mr. Baxter concerning ceremonies and conformity with a short reflection upon a scandalous pamphlet entitled, A proposition for the safety and happiness of the king and kingdom : in a letter to a gentleman of the House of Commons.The judgment of Mr. Baxter concerning ceremonies and conformity with a short reflection upon a scandalous pamphlet intituled, A proposition for the safety and happiness of the king and kingdom : in a letter to a gentleman of the House of Commons.
London: printed for R. Jenaway sic, 1667
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This is thus proved:
Argument 1. That which is not directly, or consequentially forbidden by God, remaineth lawful: A stinted Liturgy is not directly, or consequentially forbidden by God: therefore it remaineth lawful.
The Major is undoubted, because nothing but a Prohibition can make a thing unlawful. Sin is a transgression of a Law: where there is no Law, there is no Transgression: And yet I have heard very Reverend men answer this, That it is enough that it is not commanded, though not forbidden▪ Which is plainly to deny both Scripture and Civil Principles.
Now for the Minor, That a stinted Liturgy is not forbidden, we need no other proof, than that no Prohibition 1can be produced.
- 1P. 361.