A26947:990
A key for Catholics, to open the juggling of the Jesuits, and satisfy all…A key for Catholicks, to open the jugling of the Jesuits, and satisfie all…
A key for Catholics, to open the juggling of the Jesuits, and satisfy all that are but truly willing to understand, whether the cause of the Roman or reformed churches be of God ... containing some arguments by which the meanest may see the vanity of popery, and 40 detections of their fraud, with directions, and materials sufficient for the confutation of their voluminous deceits ... : the second part showeth (especially against the French and Grotians) that the Catholic Church is not united in any merely humane head, either Pope or council / by Richard Baxter, a Catholic Christian and Pastor of a church ...A key for Catholicks, to open the jugling of the Jesuits, and satisfie all that are but truly willing to understand, whether the cause of the Roman or reformed churches be of God ... containing some arguments by which the meanest may see the vanity of popery, and 40 detections of their fraud, with directions, and materials sufficient for the confutation of their voluminous deceits ... : the second part sheweth (especially against the French and Grotians) that the Catholick Church is not united in any meerly humane head, either Pope or council / by Richard Baxter, a Catholick Christian and Pastor of a church ...
London: printed by R.W. for Nevil Simmons, 1659
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And pag. 126. he cites Eman: Sa, affirming that even among Catholics many are excused from the explicit knowledge of the Trinity and Incarnation, specially if there want a Teacher: For what (saith he) shall we say that an infinite number of Christians, otherwise good people, perish, that scarce know any thing aright of the Mystery of the Trinity and Incarnation; Yea judge perversely, (or falsely) of them, if you ask them?] And cites Rozella and Midina of the same mind. Lastly gives also the judgement of Gr. Valentia fully, for his opinion, Analys. fid. lib. 2. cap. 3. lit. D.
And pag. 126. he cites Eman: Sa, affirming that even among Catholicks many are excused from the explicite knowledge of the Trinity and Incarnation, specially if there want a Teacher: For what (saith he) shall we say that an infinite number of Christians, otherwise good people, perish, that scarce know any thing aright of the Mysterie of the Trinity and Incarnation; Yea judge perversly, (or falsly) of them, if you ask them?] And cites Rozella and Midina of the same mind. Lastly gives also the judgement of Gr. Valentia fully, for his opinion, Analys. fid. lib. 2. cap. 3. lit. D.
In the sixteenth Problem page 127. he puts another Question, Whether the Law of Nature and Decalogue may be unknown without fault? And saith that though Alex. Ales say, No, yet [It is the more common and received Opinion, (citing Adrian, Corduba, Herera, & alios communiter) that there may be such ⟨p. 269⟩invincible ignorance in respect of the Law of Nature and the Decalogue.]
In the sixteenth Probleme page 127. he puts another Question, Whether the Law of Nature and Decalogue may be unknown without fault? And saith that though Alex. Ales say, No, yet [It is the more common and received Opinion, (citing Adrian, Corduba, Herera, & alios communiter) that there may be such ⟨p. 269⟩invincible ignorance in respect of the Law of Nature and the Decalogue.]