More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…

The Contents of the Third Part.

Chap. 1. THE frightful aspect of his Reply. p. 345 Chap. 2. His impenitent false allegation of Witnesses against Infant-baptism. Of Tertullian; whether Cyprian's Doctrine was Antichristian. Wycliffe vindicated at large, from his express words. Berengarius vindicated. p. 349 Chap. 3. Mr. D.'s justification of his slander of the Waldenses confuted. His witnesses examined, and his unfaithfulness opened; and the case of the Waldenses more largely explicated. p. 379 Chap. 4. His impenitence in Calumniating the Donatists and Novatians as against Infant-baptism, reprehended. p. 400 Chap. 5. His renewed Calumny of the Old Britons reproved. p. 402 ⟨image 8⟩Chap. 6. His rash report of Bishops Ushers censure of me, Considered. p. 404 Postscript. The Testimony of Smaragdus fully opened: And the reports of Peter Abbas Cluniacensis, and Bernard Abbas Clarevallensis. Their weak disingenuous course of Printing my words as against my self (in a sheet called Mr. Baxters Arguments, &c. cried about the streets) as if the necessity of professed faith for our selves, would prove that our professed faith and dedicating them to God, were not sufficient for the baptismal reception of our Infants. p. 407

Chap. 1. THE frightful aspect of his Reply. p. 345 Chap. 2. His impenitent false allegation of Witnesses against Infant-baptism. Of Tertullian; whether Cyprians Doctrine was Antichristian. Wickliff vindicated at large, from his express words. Berengarius vindicated. p. 349 Chap. 3. Mr. D.'s justification of his slander of the Waldenses confuted. His witnesses examined, and his unfaithfulness opened; and the case of the Waldenses more largely explicated. p. 379 Chap. 4. His impenitence in Calumniating the Donatists and Novatians as against Infant-baptism, reprehended. p. 400 Chap. 5. His renewed Calumny of the Old Brittains reproved. p. 402