A26959:389
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for N. Simmons and J. Robinson, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
SECT. CIII.
R. B. Quest. 6. How prove you that it was a blemish to the old frame, that Infants were members? Or that Christs Church then and now are of two frames in regard of the subjects age?
R. B. Quest. 6. HOw prove you that it was a blemish to the old frame, that Infants were members? Or that Christs Church then and now are of two frames in regard of the subjects age?
Mr. T. It was a more imperfect state in that and other regards.
Reply. I called for some proof that the Infant-membership was any part of the Church-imperfection: If it be not a blemish, why must it be done away: what, was the Church the worse for Infants Rights?