A26959:702
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for N. Simmons and J. Robinson, 1675
Chapter 4: Of Mr. Danvers's his Witnesses against Infant-Baptism.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 38. Were not this as good an argument? Luther, Calvin, Zuinglius, Bradford, Hooper; all the Martyrs in Queen Mary's days, &c. prized the Scriptures: Ergo they were all against Infant-Baptism. Yea even Independents and Presbyterians and all that prize and cleave to them now in England?
§. 38. Were not this as good an argument? Luther, Calvin, Zuinglius, Bradford, Hooper; all the Martyrs in Queen Maries dayes, &c. prized the Scriptures: Ergo they were all against Infant-Baptism. Yea even Independents and Presbyterians and all that prize and cleave to them now in England?
§. 39. 3. He addeth [Because they did so vehemently reject humane Traditions in the worship ⟨p. 261⟩of God; especially all Romish Rites and Ceremonies; this as before undeniably appearing to come from Romes ordination and Imposition.]
Answ. 1. [ Undeniably] is a word that shameth you to every intelligent Reader that understandeth Church history. Will you not confess your self that Cyprian and that Carthage Council, Nazianzene, Basil, Augustine &c. were for Infant-Baptism? were all these Papists, or Romans? Can you prove any Roman Ordination of it before all these?
Answ. 1. [ Ʋndeniably] is a word that shameth you to every intelligent Reader that understandeth Church history. Will you not confess your self that Cyprian and that Carthage Council, Nazianzene, Basil, Augustine &c. were for Infant-Baptism? were all these Papists, or Romans? Can you prove any Roman Ordination of it before all these?