A26959:936
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for N. Simmons and J. Robinson, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 9. Yea Wycliffe expressly asserteth Infant-Baptism, Dialog. li. 4. c. 11. I will give the Reader Mr. Danvers words and his together.
§. 9. Yea Wickliffe expresly asserteth Infant-Baptism, Dialog. li. 4. c. 11. I will give the Reader Mr. Danvers words and his together.
Mr. D. Reply, p. 106, 107. That Wycliffe denied Infant-Baptism, I produced so much evidence to prove it, from pag. 283. to 289. demonstrating that he not only affirmed that Believers were the only subjects of Baptism, but withal that children are not Sacramentally to be Baptized: and what can be more express evidence in the case?
Mr. D. Reply, p. 106, 107. That Wickliffe denyed Infant-Baptism, I produced so much evidence to prove it, from pag. 283. to 289. demonstrating that he not only affirmed that Believers were the only subjects of Baptism, but withal that children are not Sacramentally to be Baptized: and what can be more express evidence in the case?
And Treat. ed. 2. p. 283. That Believers are the only subject of Baptism, as appeareth in his eleventh Chap. of his Trialog. And p. 287. as a Lollard he denieth Infant-Baptism.
And Treat. ed. 2. p. 283. That Believers are the only subject of Baptism, as appeareth in his eleventh Chap. of his Trialog. And p. 287. as a Lollard he denyeth Infant-Baptism.