More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…

Answ. 1. I have not the Magdeb. at hand, but he hath little to do that will ask Illyricus, and Gallus and Amsdorfius what Lanfranc writeth, if he have his book before him. The publisher of Lanfranc's book against Berengarius giveth us notice of no other. Trithemius de script. Eccles. knew of no other but this, which is in Bibl. Patr. Tom. 6. p. 190. And I have looked over every line of it (such labour do these men put us to) and I find not one word where any such thing is mentioned ⟨p. 374⟩by Lanfranc: but only his accusations of Ber. about Transubstantiation: He never once chargeth him as denying Infant-baptism, nor mentioneth it. See, Reader, into what hands the poor seduced ones are fallen.

Answ. 1. I have not the Magdeb. at hand, but he hath little to do that will ask Illyricus, and Gallus and Amsdorfius what Lanfrank writeth, if he have his book before him. The publisher of Lanfranks book against Berengarius giveth us notice of no other. Trithemius de script. Eccles. knew of no other but this, which is in Bibl. Patr. Tom. 6. p. 190. And I have lookt over every line of it (such labour do these men put us to) and I find not one word where any such thing is mentioned ⟨p. 374⟩by Lanfrank: but only his accusations of Ber. about Transubstantiation: He never once chargeth him as denying Infant-baptism, nor mentioneth it. See, Reader, into what hands the poor seduced ones are fallen.

§. 13. His second proof is this, Cassandra in his Epistle to the Duke of Cleave saith, that Guitmund Bishop of Averse doth affirm that he did deny baptism to Little Ones, &c.

§. 13. His second proof is this, Cassandra in his Epistle to the Duke of Cleve saith, that Guitmund Bishop of Averse doth affirm that he did deny baptism to Little Ones, &c.