More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…

And now, Reader, judge further, 1. Whether this Papist who never knew the matter himself, and whose book showeth him a silly bitter fellow professing to transcribe or take his words from the Bishop of Liege who took it from fame, be to he believed in his accusations of such a man, when Lanfranc that disputed with him before the Pope, nor the Pope himself, nor any of the many Synods that examined him, and constrained him to recant, ever mention such a thing? Were these Persecutors think you blind or merciful herein? 2. If he be to be believed in this, why not in the first article, of the lawfulness of abusing all women commonly? 3. Do not the very words [quantum in se, and everterit] and [cassato baptismate] open the case, that malice gathered this as a forced consequence only of some words of Berengarius? It is like because he defined a Sacrament to their dislike, which Lanfranc reproveth him for.

And now, Reader, judge further, 1. Whether this Papist who never knew the matter himself, and whose book sheweth him a silly bitter fellow professing to transcribe or take his words from the Bishop of Liege who took it from fame, be to he believed in his accusations of such a man, when Lanfrank that disputed with him before the Pope, nor the Pope himself, nor any of the many Synods that examined him, and constrained him to recant, ever mention such a thing? Were these Persecutors think you blind or merciful herein? 2. If he be to be believed in this, why not in the first article, of the lawfulness of abusing all women commonly? 3. Do not the very words [quantum in se, and everterit] and [cassato baptismate] open the case, that malice gathered this as a forced consequence only of some words of Berengarius? It is like because he defined a Sacrament to their dislike, which Lanfrank reproveth him for.

And so sottish a fellow was this Guitmund that his fellow Papists are put to disown him for saying that their Eucharistical Host cannot be corrupted or putrefy, or be eaten by Mice, or any Brutes, but only seemeth so to be: ib. p. 230. l. 2.

And so sottish a fellow was this Guitmund that his fellow Papists are put to disown him for saying that their Eucharistical Host cannot be corrupted or putrifie, or be eaten by Mice, or any Bruits, but only seemeth so to be: ib. p. 230. l. 2.