A26962:208
Naked popery, or, The naked falsehood of a book called The Catholic naked truth,…Naked popery, or, The naked falshood of a book called The Catholick naked truth,…
Naked popery, or, The naked falsehood of a book called The Catholic naked truth, or, The Puritan convert to apostolical Christianity, written by W.H. opening their fundamental error of unwritten tradition, and their unjust description of the Puritans, the prelatical Protestant, and the papist, and their differences, and better acquainting the ignorant of the same difference, especially what a Puritan and what a papist is / by Richard Baxter ...Naked popery, or, The naked falshood of a book called The Catholick naked truth, or, The Puritan convert to apostolical Christianity, written by W.H. opening their fundamental errour of unwritten tradition, and their unjust description of the Puritans, the prelatical Protestant, and the papist, and their differences, and better acquainting the ignorant of the same difference, especially what a Puritan and what a papist is / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for N. Simmons, 1677
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
[It seemeth to be the common opinion of the Schools and Doctors at this day, that the Laity erring with their Teachers, ⟨p. 86⟩or Pastors, are altogether excused from all fault: Yea, by erring thus many ways materially they merit for the Act of Christian Obedience which they owe, their Teachers, as Valentia saith To. 3. Disp. 1. q. 2. p. 5. and others with Angles, Vas. quez. &c.]
[It seemeth to be the common opinion of the Schools and Doctors at this day, that the Laity erring with their Teachers, ⟨p. 86⟩or Pastors, are altogether excused from all fault: Yea, by erring thus many wayes materially they merit for the Act of Christian Obedience which they owe, their Teachers, as Valentia saith To. 3. Disp. 1. q. 2. p. 5. and others with Angles, Vas. quez. &c.]
And if this be true, what Prince, Lord, or any other Lay-man, that would be out of all danger of Sin and Hell, would not be a Papist, and be sure to choose a Priest that is ignorant enough to take Perjury, Drunkenness, Gluttony, Adultery, Fornication, Persecution, Oppression for no Sin, and then he may be sure that it's none to him, but he meriteth by obeying him that will persuade him to it?
And if this be true, what Prince, Lord, or any other Lay-man, that would be out of all danger of Sin and Hell, would not be a Papist, and be sure to chuse a Priest that is ignorant enough to take Perjury, Drunkenness, Gluttony, Adultery, Fornication, Persecution, Opression for no Sin, and then he may be sure that it's none to him, but he meriteth by obeying him that will perswade him to it?