A26962:448
Naked popery, or, The naked falsehood of a book called The Catholic naked truth,…Naked popery, or, The naked falshood of a book called The Catholick naked truth,…
Naked popery, or, The naked falsehood of a book called The Catholic naked truth, or, The Puritan convert to apostolical Christianity, written by W.H. opening their fundamental error of unwritten tradition, and their unjust description of the Puritans, the prelatical Protestant, and the papist, and their differences, and better acquainting the ignorant of the same difference, especially what a Puritan and what a papist is / by Richard Baxter ...Naked popery, or, The naked falshood of a book called The Catholick naked truth, or, The Puritan convert to apostolical Christianity, written by W.H. opening their fundamental errour of unwritten tradition, and their unjust description of the Puritans, the prelatical Protestant, and the papist, and their differences, and better acquainting the ignorant of the same difference, especially what a Puritan and what a papist is / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for N. Simmons, 1677
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
So also the Egyptian Monks were the most famous for Miracles of any People. And yet (as their Miracles were no confirmation of the error of the Anthropomorphites which their simplicity and rashness involved them in, so) they renounced Communion with the Church of Rome, and therefore confirmed it not by their Miracles.
So also the Egyptian Monks were the most famous for Miracles of any People. And yet (as their Miracles were no confirmation of the errour of the Anthropomorphites which their simplicity and rashness involved them in, so) they renounced Communion with the Church of Rome, and therefore confirmed it not by their Miracles.
How few Christians be there on Earth, if none are such but those that by known Popish miracles believed the Pope to be infallible before they believed that there was a Christ?
And thus they must believe him to be Infallible not as Pope, but somewhat else: For to be Pope, is to be [Christs pretended Vicar:] And to believe that he is authorized or Infallible as Christs Vicar, before they believe there is a Christ, is a mad-mans contradiction and impossible. ⟨p. 158⟩What Infallible wight then is it that we must first believe the Pope to be, before we believe him to be Pope? To what impudence will interest and faction carry men?