A26974:1090
Of justification four disputations clearing and amicably defending the truth against the unnecessary oppositions…
Of justification four disputations clearing and amicably defending the truth against the unnecessary oppositions of divers learned and reverend brethren / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed by R.W. for Nevil Simmons, 1658
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To your tenth Objection I answer by denying the consequence; we speak of the soul as rational, and not as sensitive or vegetative. When the understanding & Will receive Christ, the whole soul doth it: that is, every faculty, or the soul by a ⟨p. 358⟩full entire motion in its several Actings to the Object presented, both as true and good. Your Joy, Hope, Fear, are in the sensitive: And Love as a Passion, and as commonly taken. And for Memory, take it for an act of the Understanding; or of Understanding and Imagination conjunct; or for a third faculty as please your self, it will not breed any difficulty in the case. But whether Fear be properly a Receiving of Christ, or any Object as Good, I much question. I take it rather for the shunning of an evil, then the Reception of Good. So much for your Objections.
I will next, as impartially as I can, consider your Answers to what I laid down for the proof of the Point in Question. But first I must acknowledge▪ that I have given you and others great advantage against the Doctrine of that Book, by the immethodicalness, and neglect of Art, and not giving the Arguments in form, which I then thought not so necessary as now I perceive it is: (for I was ready to yield wholly to Gibeeuf's reasons against formal arguing, Praefat. ante lib. 2. de Libertate.) The present expectation of death caused me to make that haste, which I now repent: yet, though I see some oversights in the manner of expression, I see no cause to change my mind in the Doctrine of it.
I will next, as impartially as I can, consider your Answers to what I laid down for the proof of the Point in Question. But first I must acknowledge▪ that I have given you and others great advantage against the Doctrine of that Book, by the immethodicalness, and neglect of Art, and not giving the Arguments in form, which I then thought not so necessary as now I perceive it is: (for I was ready to yield wholly to Gibeeufs reasons against formal arguing, Praefat. ante lib. 2. de Libertate.) The present expectation of death caused me to make that haste, which I now repent: yet, though I see some oversights in the manner of expression, I see no cause to change my mind in the Doctrine of it.