Of justification four disputations clearing and amicably defending the truth against the unnecessary oppositions…

Secondly you very much mistake my judgement here, if you think it the same with yours: Nor will the mention of an act of oblivion justify your mistake I suppose an Act of oblivion may possibly have a Penalty annexed, (as, that all that stand our, and accept not of this pardon by such a year or day, shall be remediless, and liable to a greater Penalty,) And I think if no Penalty be named, there is one implied.

Secondly you very much mistake my judgement here, if you think it the same with yours: Nor will the mention of an act of oblivion justifie your mistake I suppose an Act of oblivion may possibly have a Penalty anexed, (as, that all that stand our, and accept not of this pardon by such a year or day, shall be remediless, and lyable to a greater Penalty,) And I think if no Penalty be named, there is one implyed.

For my part, I am satisfied that the Remedying Law, or the Law of Grace, hath its special Threatening, when I so often read it, [He that believeth shall be saved, and he that believeth not shall be damned] and [unless ye believe that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.] And I take it to differ from the Threatening of the law of works, thus.

For my part, I am satisfied that the Remedying Law, or the Law of Grace, hath its special Threatning, when I so often read it, [He that believeth shall be saved, and he that believeth not shall be damned] and [unless ye believe that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.] And I take it to differ from the Threatning of the law of works, thus.

First, In the matter of the condition; which is not sin in general; any sin: but a special sin, viz. the final rejecting the Remedy; that is, Refusing to turn to God by faith in Christ.