A26974:52
Of justification four disputations clearing and amicably defending the truth against the unnecessary oppositions…
Of justification four disputations clearing and amicably defending the truth against the unnecessary oppositions of divers learned and reverend brethren / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed by R.W. for Nevil Simmons, 1658
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The CONTENTS.
The CONTETS.
Disputation 1. Quest. Whether we are justified by believing in Jesus Christ as our King and Teacher, as well as by believing in his blood? Aff. pag. 1. The state and weight of the Controversy p. 2, &c. Ten Propositions for fuller explication. p. 10, &c. Argument first. p. 13 Argu. 2. p. 14 Argu. 3. p. 19 Argu. 4. p. 24 Argu. 5. p. 27 Argu. 6. p. 28 Argu. 7. p. 30 Argu. 8. p. 31 Argu. 9. p. 35 Argu. 10. p. 38 defended against Mr. Black's assault. p. 40 Whether the Law of Grace condemn any, and how. p. 44, 45 The Distinction of sides quae justificat, & quâ justificat considered. p. 46, &c. ⟨image 9⟩MR. Black's first Argument answered. p. 53 Argument 2. answered. p. 55 Argument 3. p. 57 Argument 4. p. 63 Argument 5. and 6. p. 64
Disputation 1. Quest. WHether we are justified by believing in Jesus Christ as our King and Teacher, as well as by believing in his blood? Aff. pag. 1. The state and weight of the Controversie p. 2, &c. Ten Propositions for fuller explication. p. 10, &c. Argument first. p. 13 Argu. 2. p. 14 Argu. 3. p. 19 Argu. 4. p. 24 Argu. 5. p. 27 Argu. 6. p. 28 Argu. 7. p. 30 Argu. 8. p. 31 Argu. 9. p. 35 Argu. 10. p. 38 defended against Mr. Blak's assault. p. 40 Whether the Law of Grace condemn any, and how. p. 44, 45 The Distinction of sides quae justificat, & quâ justificat considered. p. 46, &c. ⟨image 9⟩MR. Blak's first Argument answered. p. 53 Argument 2. answered. p. 55 Argument 3. p. 57 Argument 4. p. 63 Argument 5. and 6. p. 64
Disputation 2. Quest. Whether works are a condition of condition of Justification, and so whether we are justified by works as such a condition? The terms [Works and Justification] explained. p. 70, 71 The Term Condition explained. p. 72 The Truth laid down in several Propositions. p. 75 Negative and Affirmative The main Proposition proved. p. 79, &c. Quest. Can Christ be Instrumental in justifying. p. 84 Quest. Did Christ expiate the sins, that by the Gospel men are obliged to punishment for? p. 86 Of Repentance, and the habit of Faith in Justification. p. 85, 86 Quest. Doth the Gospel justify us? p. 86, 87, 88, 89 Other points briefly discussed. p. 90 The Opponents stating of the Question. p. 94, 95, 96 Divers unjust charges repelled. p. 97, to 101 The Opponents Thesis and Arguments. p. 101, 102 How Abraham was justified, debated to p. 110 All works make not the Reward to be not of Grace, proved by six Arguments. p. 111, to 115. And by Expositors. p. 115, &c. His second Argument from the difference put between faith and other Graces in Justification. p. 118 The case of faiths Interest opened by a similitude. p. 120 His third Argument considered: Our first Justification how