A26976:301
Of the immortality of mans soul, and the nature of it and other spirits.…
Of the immortality of mans soul, and the nature of it and other spirits. Two discourses, one in a letter to an unknown doubter, the other in a reply to Dr. Henry Moore's Animadversions on a private letter to him, which he published in his second edition of Mr. Joseph Glanvil's Sadducismus triumphatus, or, History of apparitions by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for B. Simons, 1682
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 7. You add you self, That those attainments which you were made capable of, you were designed to. Very right. God maketh not such noble Faculties or Capacities in vain; much less to engage all men to a life of duty, which shall prove deceit and misery. But you have Faculties capable of thinking of God, as your Beginning, Guide, and End, as your Maker, Ruler, and Benefactor; ⟨p. 30⟩and of studying your duty to him, in hope of Reward, and of thinking what will become of you after Death, and of hoping for future Blessedness, and fearing future Misery: all which no Brute was ever capable of. Therefore God designed you to such ends which you are thus capable of.
§. 7. You add you self, That those attainments which you were made capable of, you were designed to. Very right. God maketh not such noble Faculties or Capacities in vain; much less to engage all men to a life of duty, which shall prove deceit and misery. But you have Faculties capable of thinking of God, as your Beginning, Guide, and End, as your Maker, Ruler, and Benefactor; ⟨p. 30⟩and of studying your duty to him, in hope of Reward, and of thinking what will become of you after Death, and of hoping for future Blessedness, and fearing future Misery: all which no Bruit was ever capable of. Therefore God designed you to such ends which you are thus capable of.
§. 8. You say (p. 3.) Many have defended the Souls Immortality; but none have proved a Subject capable of a life of Retribution. It's a Contradiction to be immortal, or rewarded, and not to be a Subject capable. For nothing hath no accidents. Nothing hath that which it is not capable of having.
§. 8. You say (p. 3.) Many have defended the Souls Immortality; but none have proved a Subject capable of a life of Retribution. It's a Contradiction to be immortal, or rewarded, and not to be a Subject capable. For nothing hath no accidents. Nothing hath that which it is not capable of haing.