A26977:627
Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sense [sic] sound Protestants…Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sence [sic] sound Protestants…
Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sense [sic] sound Protestants hold it and of the false devised sense by which libertines subvert the Gospel : with an answer to some common objections, especially of Dr. Thomas Tully whose Justif. Paulina occasioneth the publication of this / by Richard Baxter a compassionate lamenter of the Church's wounds caused by hasty judging ... and by the theological wars which are hereby raised and managed ...Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sence [sic] sound Protestants hold it and of the false divised sence by which libertines subvert the Gospel : with an answer to some common objections, especially of Dr. Thomas Tully whose Justif. Paulina occasioneth the publication of this / by Richard Baxter a compassionate lamenter of the Church's wounds caused by hasty judging ... and by the theological wars which are hereby raised and managed ...
London: printed for Nevil Simmons and Jonathan Robinson, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5. If he will say that in Law-sense, we have or are two Persons, let him expound the word Persons only, as of Qualities and Relations, (nothing to our Case in hand); or else say also, That as we are holy and perfect in one of our own Persons, and sinful, unrighteous, or ungodly in another, so a Man my be in Heaven in one of his own Persons, and on Earth, yea and in Hell in the other: And if he mean that the same Man is justified in his Person in Christ, and condemned in his other Person; consider which of these is the Physical Person, for I think its that which is like to suffer.
§. 7. pag. 224. He hath another touch at my Epistle, but gently forbeareth contradiction as to Num. 8. And he saith so little to the 11th, as needeth no answer.
§. 8. pag. 127. He assaulteth the first Num. of N. 13. That we all agree against any conceit of Works that are against or instead of the free Mercy of God].
And what hath he against this? Why that ⟨p. 196⟩