Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sense [sic] sound Protestants…Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sence [sic] sound Protestants…

And you that know which of my Books is the most Elaborate, sure know, that in that Book which I Wrote to explain those Aphorisms (called my Confession) I cite the Words of above an Hundred Protestant Witnesses, that give as much to Works as I do: And that of this Hundred, one is the Augustine Confession, one the Westminster Synod, one the Synod of Dort, one the Church of England, each one of which being Collectives, contain many. (And here I tell you of more). And have you brought more Witnesses? Or any to the contrary? Did you Confute, or once take Notice of any of these? 4. Do you not here before you are aware, let your Reader know that it was, and still is, in the Dark, that you Alarm the World about our dangerous Differences, and run to your Arms underest, before your Eyes are open? Qui conveniunt in aliquo tertio, &c. They that agree with the Church of England, in the Doctrine of Justification by Faith, do so far agree between themselves: But Dr. Tully, and R.B. do agree with the Church of England, in the Doctrine of Justification by Faith. Ergo.— The Article referreth to the Homilies, where it is more fully Explained. 5. May not I then retort your Argument, and bid you [For shame let it be no longer Bellarmine, and R.B. but the Church of England, and all the Reformed, and R.B.]? Disprove the Witnesses twenty years ago, produced by me in this very Cause; or else speak out, and say, [The Church of England, and the rest of the Reformed, hold Justification by ⟨p. 17⟩Works, just as Bellarmine and the Papists do] which is it which you would fasten on me, who agree with them (as if you had never there read my Answer to Mr. Crandon, objecting the same thing). §. IV. Your Censure, pag. 10, 11. of my Windings, Clouds of Novel Distinctions, Preambles, Limitations, &c. is just such as your Treatise did bid me expect: Till you become guilty of the same Crime, and fall out with Confusion, and take not equivocal ambiguous Words unexplained, instead of Univocals, in the stating of your Questions, I shall never the more believe that Hannibal is at the Gates, or the City on Fire, for your Alarms. §. V. Pag. 11. Where you tell me, that [You have no Profit by my Preface: I shall not deny it, nor wonder at it; you are the fittest Judge: Where you say, that [I have no Credit,] You do but tell the World at what Rates you write. Honour est in honorante.

And you that know which of my Books is the most Elaborate, sure know, that in that Book which I Wrote to explain those Aphorisms (called my Confession) I cite the Words of above an Hundred Protestant Witnesses, that give as much to Works as I do: And that of this Hundred, one is the Augustine Confession, one the Westminster Synod, one the Synod of Dort, one the Church of England, each one of which being Collectives, contain many. (And here I tell you of more). And have you brought more Witnesses? Or any to the contrary? Did you Confute, or once take Notice of any of these? 4. Do you not here before you are aware, let your Reader know that it was, and still is, in the Dark, that you Alarm the World about our dangerous Differences, and run to your Arms undrest, before your Eyes are open? Qui conveniunt in aliquo tertio, &c. They that agree with the Church of England, in the Doctrine of Justification by Faith, do so far agree between themselves: But Dr. Tullie, and R.B. do agree with the Church of England, in the Doctrine of Justification by Faith. Ergo.— The Article referreth to the Homilies, where it is more fully Explained. 5. May not I then retort your Argument, and bid you [For shame let it be no longer Bellarnine, and R.B. but the Church of England, and all the Reformed, and R.B.]? Disprove the Witnesses twenty years ago, produced by me in this very Cause; or else speak out, and say, [The Church of England, and the rest of the Reformed, hold Justification by