Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sense [sic] sound Protestants…Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sence [sic] sound Protestants…

But, 1. He feigneth a Case stated between him and me, who never had to do with him before, but as with others in my Writings, where I state my Case my self. 2. He never so much as toucheth either of my Disputations of Original Sin, in which I state my Case and defend it. 3. And he falsely feigneth the Case stated, in words (and he supposeth in a sense) that I never had do do with: Saying, [I charge you with a new secondary Original Sin, whose Pedigree is not from Adam: I engage not a syllable further]. And pag. 8. [You have asserted that this Novel Original Sin is not derived from our Original Father; no line of Communication between them; a sin besides that which is derived from Adam, ⟨p. 88⟩as you plainly and positively affirm]. I never said that it had no Pedigree, no line of Communication, no kind of derivation from Adam. 4. Yea, if he would not touch the Disputation where I state my Case, he should have noted it as stated in the very Preface which he writeth against; and yet there also he totally overlooketh it, though opened in divers Propositions. 5. And the words in an Epistle to another Mans Book, which he fasteneth still on were these; [Over-looking the Interest of Children in the Actions of their nearer Parents, and think that they participate of no Guilt, and suffer for no Original Sin, but Adams only]. And after, [They had more Original Sin than what they had from Adam]. 6. He tells me, that [I seem not to understand my own Question, nor to know well how to set about my Work]; and he will teach me how to manage the Business that I have undertaken, and so he tells me how I MUST state the Question hereafter, (see his words). Reader, some Reasons may put a better Title on this Learned Doctors actions; but if ever I write at this rate, I heartily desire thee to cast it away as utter DISHONESTY and IMPUDENCE.

But, 1. He feigneth a Case stated between him and me, who never had to do with him before, but as with others in my Writings, where I state my Case my self. 2. He never so much as toucheth either of my Disputations of Original Sin, in which I state my Case and defend it. 3. And he falsly feigneth the Case stated, in words (and he supposeth in a sense) that I never had do do with: Saying, [I charge you with a new secondary Original Sin, whose Pedegree is not from Adam: I engage not a syllable further]. And pag. 8. [You have asserted that this Novel Original Sin is not derived from our Original Father; no line of Communication between them; a sin besides that which is derived from Adam,