A26977:717
Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sense [sic] sound Protestants…Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sence [sic] sound Protestants…
Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sense [sic] sound Protestants hold it and of the false devised sense by which libertines subvert the Gospel : with an answer to some common objections, especially of Dr. Thomas Tully whose Justif. Paulina occasioneth the publication of this / by Richard Baxter a compassionate lamenter of the Church's wounds caused by hasty judging ... and by the theological wars which are hereby raised and managed ...Of the imputation of Christ's righteousness to believers in what sence [sic] sound Protestants hold it and of the false divised sence by which libertines subvert the Gospel : with an answer to some common objections, especially of Dr. Thomas Tully whose Justif. Paulina occasioneth the publication of this / by Richard Baxter a compassionate lamenter of the Church's wounds caused by hasty judging ... and by the theological wars which are hereby raised and managed ...
London: printed for Nevil Simmons and Jonathan Robinson, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 3. His second Spark is Animadversions on a sheet of mine, before mentioned, which are such as I am not willing to meddle with, seeing I cannot either handle them, or name them as the nature of them doth require, without offending him: And if what is here said (of Imputation and Representation) ⟨p. 93⟩be not enough, I will add no more, nor write over and over still the same things, because a Man that will take no notice of the many Volumes which answer all his Objections long ago, will call for more, and will write his Animadversions upon a single Sheet that was written on another particular occasion, and pretend to his discoveries of my Deceits from the Silence of that Sheet, and from my naming the Antinomians.
§. 3. His second Spark is Animadversions on a sheet of mine, before mentioned, which are such as I am not willing to meddle with, seeing I cannot either handle them, or name them as the nature of them doth require, without offending him: And if what is here said (of Imputation and Representation) ⟨p. 93⟩be not enough, I will add no more, nor write over and over still the same things, because a Man that will take no notice of the many Volumns which answer all his Objections long ago, will call for more, and will write his Animadversions upon a single Sheet that was written on another particular occasion, and pretend to his discoveries of my Deceits from the Silence of that Sheet, and from my naming the Antinomians.
I only say, 1. If this Mans way of Disputing were the common way, I would abhor Disputing, and be ashamed of the Name.
2. I do friendly desire the Author of the Friendly Debate, Mr. Sherlock, and all others that would fasten such Doctrines on the Non-Conformists, as a Character of the Party, to observe that this Doctor sufficiently confuteth their partiality; and that their Academical Church-Doctors, are as Confused, as Vehement maintainers of such expressions as they account most unsavoury, as any even of the Independents cited by them: Yea, that this Doctor would make us question whether there be now any Antinomians among us, and so whether all the Conformists that have charged the Conformists,