A26981:536
A paraphrase on the New Testament with notes, doctrinal and practical, by plainness and…A paraphrase on the New Testament with notes, doctrinal and practical, by plainess and…
A paraphrase on the New Testament with notes, doctrinal and practical, by plainness and brevity fitted to the use of religious families, in their daily reading of the Scriptures : and of the younger and poorer sort of scholars and ministers, who want fuller helps : with an advertisement of difficulties in the Revelations / by Richard Baxter.A paraphrase on the New Testament with notes, doctrinal and practical, by plainess and brevity fitted to the use of religious families, in their daily reading of the Scriptures : and of the younger and poorer sort of scholars and ministers, who want fuller helps : with an advertisement of difficulties in the Revelations / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for B. Simmons, 1685
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Note, That the Pharisees controversy against Christ was, that he was not religious, and strict enough in keeping Gods Law: so that pretended strictness is no proof that men are in the right.
Note, That the Pharisees controversie against Christ was, that he was not religious, and strict enough in keeping Gods Law: so that pretended strictness is no proof that men are in the right.
3. But he said to them, Have ye not read what David did when he was hungered, and they that were with him, 4. How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the show-bread, which was not lawful for him to eat, nor for them that were with him, but only for the priests? 5. Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?
3. But he said to them, Have ye not read what David did when he was hungred, and they that were with him, 4. How he entred into the house of God, and did eat the shew-bread, which was not lawful for him to eat, nor for them that were with him, but only for the priests? 5. Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?
3, 4, 5. Your strictness and your accusation of my Disciples, are but from your ignorance of the Scripture. Have ye not read that hunger justified David and his company for eating the consecrated Bread, which else none but the Priests might lawfully eat. And that the Priests in the temple labour on the Sabbath, and break the outward rest of the day, which would be profanation, did not the Temple service justify it.
3, 4, 5. Your strictness and your accusation of my Disciples, are but from your ignorance of the Scripture. Have ye not read that hunger justified David and his company for eating the consecrated Bread, which else none but the Priests might lawfully eat. And that the Priests in the temple labour on the Sabbath, and break the outward rest of the day, which would be profanation, did not the Temple service justifie it.