A26982:155
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
24. The King had before assaulted the Parliament-House in Person, with Armed Men, to have surprised Five Members and the Lord Kimbolton whom he accused: And after frustration confessed it a Breach of their Privileges.
24. The King had before assaulted the Parliament-House in Person, with Armed Men, to have surprized Five Members and the Lord Kimbolton whom he accused: And after frustration confest it a Breach of their Privileges.
25. The Money sent Dolbier to buy German Horses, and other actions, and the Confessions of Sir Jacob Astley, Sir John Conniers, Sir Fulke Hawks (my Mother-in-laws Brother) Chidley, and the other Commanders of the English Army that were to have been drawn up to London, together with the King's putting a Guarding Regiment on them, did put me past all doubt that they were devoted to violence, had they not defended themselves: And no vain Talk to the contrary can make me doubt of it to this day. So that though I think they had done more prudently to avoid War, had they spared Strafford and Laud to please the King, yet I am fully satisfied that afterward they were necessitated to save themselves from designed Force.
25. The Money sent Dolbier to buy German Horses, and other actions, and the Confessions of Sir Jacob Astley, Sir John Conniers, Sir Fulke Haukes (my Mother-in-laws Brother) Chidley, and the other Commanders of the English Army that were to have been drawn up to London, together with the King's putting a Guarding Regiment on them, did put me past all doubt that they were devoted to violence, had they not defended themselves: And no vain Talk to the contrary can make me doubt of it to this day. So that though I think they had done more prudently to avoid War, had they spared Strafford and Laud to please the King, yet I am fully satisfied that afterward they were necessitated to save themselves from designed Force.