A26982:200
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. Because in opposition to Harrington, I had pleaded for Monarchy, with some excess, and I wished that I had not meddled with Government, but left all to the Providence of God.
2. Because in opposition to Harrington, I had pleaded for Monarchy, with some excess, and I wisht that I had not medled with Government, but left all to the Providence of God.
3. Because it did occasion more hurt than good: so that it became the common Theme of ambitious young Preachers, especially at Court, before K. Ch. II. as the way to Preferment, to talk against The Holy Commonwealth, falsely persuading men that by a Commonwealth I meant Democracy or Popular Government, which the Book was purposely written against. So that when the Oxford University burnt that Book (with Dr. Whitby's excellent Reconciler, and some others) though I expostulated with the Vice-Chancellor concerning its Principles, I told them I consented that the Book was burnt: though I told them not why, as now I do.
3. Because it did occasion more hurt than good: so that it became the common Theme of ambitious young Preachers, especially at Court, before K. Ch. II. as the way to Preferment, to talk against The Holy Commonwealth, falsly perswading men that by a Commonwealth I meant Democracy or Popular Government, which the Book was purposely written against. So that when the Oxford University burnt that Book (with Dr. Whitby's excellent Reconciler, and some others) though I expostulated with the Vice-Chancellor concerning its Principles, I told them I consented that the Book was burnt: though I told them not why, as now I do.
XXXVII. Though both Nature and Grace inclined me to hate Lying, and specially in Writers and Preachers, and I honoured Jul. Caes. Scaliger the more, because his Son Joseph tells us how vehemently he hated a Lie, so that he could not be reconciled to a Liar, yet I confess that my impatience herein was faulty. It was long before I well perceived that the Father of Lies, doth Govern his Kingdom (most of the World) by mere Lying: Call it Error, or Mistake, or Falsehood, or what you will, all signifieth the same thing: It is delivering Falsehood for Truth. Christ had told us that the Devil is the Father of Lies, and when he speaketh a Lie, he speaketh his own. Deceit is by Lying, and by this he ruleth his World. As God's Image consisteth in Life, Light and Love, the Devil's Image is Hatred. Falsehood and Hurtfulness or Murder,